20 Debate Speech Topics on Animal Experimentation

20 Debate Speech Topics on Animal Experimentation In the previous guide we explored animal experimentation and revealed some very disturbing facts. Study our 10 facts on animal experimentation for a debate speech in detail to find out various arguments regarding the disgraced research community. Sadly, after the completion of these experimentations, the animals used are euthanized. Majority of these small test subjects are purpose-bred. Due to the ever growing existence of organizations such as PETA and BUAV, the medical community is under heavy pressure to find alternatives to animal experimentation such as sophisticated computer models. To help you narrow down your debate area, here are 20 topics which you can select from. Number of Animals Used for Experimentation Trends and Public Opinion Towards Animal Rights History of Vaccines Developed Through Animal Experimentation Failure of Mouse Diabetes Model Differences Between Human and Animal Immunology Inconclusive Research of Spinal Cord Injury Recovery from Animal Experimentation Failure of Research Gained from Animal Experimentation in Neurological Diseases Suffering of Animals During Medical Procedures Psychological Effects On Animals Due to Confinement Health and Sanitary Condition of Laboratories of Animal Experimentation Types of Traumatic Injuries Inflicted During Animal Experimentation Military Animal Experiments What Methods Are Implemented on Animals During Induced Helplessness Tests? Planting Electrodes into Eyes and Brains of Animals Case of Self-Mutilation in Animals When Kept in Cages in Laboratories Alternatives to Animal Experimentations Failures of Animal Experimentation in Improving Human Health and Scientific Discovery Epidemiology and Animal Experimentation: Which One Is More Successful? Computer-Based Research Technique in Comparison with Animal Experimentation Virtual Human Trials through Intrinsic Computer Models. We have assisted you with our guide for a debate to help give you a little nudge in the right direction and then we went a step further by giving you direct topics. A large portion of the International community is now questioning the very legitimacy of animal experimentation, appealing to the cruel nature of these experiments, the condition in which the animals are kept and the amount of misleading and inconclusive animal models which have yet to serve the human medical needs. Primarily, the argument against this kind of experimentation is that the animals have the right not to be used and harmed. As always, we aim to exceed your expectation. Here is a sample essay on one of the topics above. Sample Debate Speech: Computer-based Research Technique in Comparison with Animal Experimentation There is a growing number of consensus to reduce or eliminate animal experimentation, that’s why there is a huge school of thought researching to find alternatives. Major alternatives to animal experimentation are vitro cell culture techniques and computer simulation based research. There are some who believe these alternates are not conclusive because these simulations are using data acquired from prior experiments, meaning the data is too old and cells/serums are virtual.   There is another school of thought which believes that animal experimentation can never be replaced because the living system is too complicated to be simulated. Computer simulations can not only replace animal experimentations but they can also help with reducing the cost and speed up the discovery time. While conducting drug tests, the candidates data can be utilized to help improve the virtual models. In 2010, the protein docking algorithm EADock helped find possible inhibitors to particular enzyme affiliated with cancer. Around fifty percent of these molecules were later confirmed to be positively active inhibitors, this discovery happened outside of a human body and in labs. This kind of approach is very different from the costly high-throughput screening robotics labs which and capable of testing huge quantities of complicated compounds in a single day. There are several examples of computer simulations such as the model of asthma. The studies regarding medicines developed using that model needs to go through a lot of careful testing before they are approved to be used by humans and animals. Full sized mannequins are also used for computer simulations to generate data of crashes. These tests are conducted with the use of real time sensors and cameras, ever since the advancement in this field, it has replaced live animal trauma testing in car crashes. The first such establishment began in 1949, known as Sierra Sam, built by Alderson Research Labs of Sierra Engineering. Through the years, the dummies and the monitoring equipment have significantly changed, before live pigs were used as test subjects in crash testing. The military has been using simulators to recreate battlefield scenarios, especially traumas. Systems such as the TraumaMan and the Combat Trauma Patient Simulator have successfully given research analysis on fractures, amputations and hemorrhaging. Before this, animal were used to find out the results of various injuries, but now the success of TraumaMan has made it possible for the medical community to do this without the torture and execution of animals. Human metabolism has also been successfully portrayed through computer models, this has resulted in the study of various plaque related cardiovascular risks. It has also helped the medical community to examine the toxicity of drugs, replacing the drug testing on animals altogether. Not only this, but in 2007, using the world’s most sophisticated computer of that time, a program simulated a mouse’s brain for around 10 seconds. Limitations in computing power of the time brought forth problems in simulation but the fact remains that such simulations are possible. References: Hackam DG, Redelmeier DA. Translation of research evidence from animals to humans. JAMA. 2006;296:1731-1732. Horrobin DF. Modern biomedical research: an internally self consistent universe with little contact with medical reality? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003;2:151-154. Ioannidis JPA. Evolution and translation of research findings: from bench to where? PLoS Clin Trials 2006;1:e36. Langley G, Evans T, Holgate ST, Jones A. Replacing animal experiments: choices, chances, and challenges. BioEssays 2007;29:918-926. Perel P, Roberts I, Sena E, et al. Comparison of treatment effects between animal experiments and clinical trials: systematic review. BMJ 2006;334, 197 (doi:10.1136/bmj.39048.407928.BE). Pound P, Ebrahim S, Sandercock P, Bracken MB, Roberts I. Where is the evidence that animal research benefits humans? BMJ 2004;328:514-517. Watts G. Alternatives to animal experimentation. BMJ 2007;334:182-184.

The Inaugural Address of John F. Kennedy

The Inaugural Address of John F. Kennedy John Kennedys inaugural address is one of the most memorable political speeches of the past century. The young presidents reliance on biblical quotations, metaphors, parallelism, and antithesis recall some of the powerful speeches of Abraham Lincoln. The most famous line in Kennedys address (Ask not . . .) is a classic example of chiasmus. In his book White House Ghosts (Simon Schuster, 2008), journalist Robert Schlesinger (the son of historian Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., a Kennedy adviser) outlines some of the distinctive qualities of John Kennedys oratorical style: Short words and clauses were the order, with simplicity and clarity the goal. A self-described idealist without illusions, JFK preferred a cool, cerebral approach and had little use for florid expressions and complex prose. He liked alliteration, not solely for reasons of rhetoric but to reinforce the audiences recollection of his reasoning. His taste for contrapuntal phrasingnever negotiating out of fear but never fearing to negotiateillustrated his dislike of extreme opinions and options. As you read Kennedys speech, consider how his methods of expression contribute to the forcefulness of his message. The Inaugural Address of John F. Kennedy (January 20, 1961) Vice President Johnson, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Chief Justice, President Eisenhower, Vice President Nixon, President Truman, reverend clergy, fellow citizens, we observe today not a victory of party, but a celebration of freedomsymbolizing an end, as well as a beginningsignifying renewal, as well as change. For I have sworn before you and Almighty God the same solemn oath our forebears prescribed nearly a century and three-quarters ago. The world is very different now. For man holds in his mortal hands the power to abolish all forms of human poverty and all forms of human life. And yet the same revolutionary beliefs for which our forebears fought are still at issue around the globethe belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God. We dare not forget today that we are the heirs of that first revolution. Let the word go forth from this time and place, to friend and foe alike, that the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americansborn in this century, tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, proud of our ancient heritage, and unwilling to witness or permit the slow undoing of those human rights to which this nation has always been committed, and to which we are committed today at home and around the world. Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, to assure the survival and the success of liberty. This much we pledgeand more. To those old allies whose cultural and spiritual origins we share, we pledge the loyalty of faithful friends. United there is little we cannot do in a host of cooperative ventures. Divided there is little we can dofor we dare not meet a powerful challenge at odds and split asunder. To those peoples in the huts and villages of half the globe struggling to break the bonds of mass misery, we pledge our best efforts to help them help themselves, for whatever period is requirednot because the Communists may be doing it, not because we seek their votes, but because it is right. If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich. To our sister republics south of our border, we offer a special pledge: to convert our good words into good deeds, in a new alliance for progress, to assist free men and free governments in casting off the chains of poverty. But this peaceful revolution of hope cannot become the prey of hostile powers. Let all our neighbors know that we shall join with them to oppose aggression or subversion anywhere in the Americas. And let every other power know that this hemisphere intends to remain the master of its own house. To that world assembly of sovereign states, the United Nations, our last best hope in an age where the instruments of war have far outpaced the instruments of peace, we renew our pledge of supportto prevent it from becoming merely a forum for invective, to strengthen its shield of the new and the weakand to enlarge the area in which its writ may run. Finally, to those nations who would make themselves our adversary, we offer not a pledge but a request: that both sides begin anew the quest for peace, before the dark powers of destruction unleashed by science engulf all humanity in planned or accidental self-destruction. We dare not tempt them with weakness. For only when our arms are sufficient beyond doubt can we be certain beyond doubt that they will never be employed. But neither can two great and powerful groups of nations take comfort from our present courseboth sides overburdened by the cost of modern weapons, both rightly alarmed by the steady spread of the deadly atom, yet both racing to alter that uncertain balance of terror that stays the hand of mankinds final war. So let us begin anewremembering on both sides that civility is not a sign of weakness, and sincerity is always subject to proof. Let us never negotiate out of fear, but let us never fear to negotiate. Let both sides explore what problems unite us instead of belaboring those problems which divide us. Let both sides, for the first time, formulate serious and precise proposals for the inspection and control of arms, and bring the absolute power to destroy other nations under the absolute control of all nations. Let both sides seek to invoke the wonders of science instead of its terrors. Together let us explore the stars, conquer the deserts, eradicate disease, tap the ocean depths, and encourage the arts and commerce. Let both sides unite to heed, in all corners of the earth, the command of Isaiahto undo the heavy burdens, and to let the oppressed go free. And, if a beachhead of cooperation may push back the jungle of suspicion, let both sides join in creating a new endeavornot a new balance of power, but a new world of lawwhere the strong are just and the weak secure and the peace preserved. All this will not be finished in the first one hundred days. Nor will it be finished in the first one thousand days, nor in the life of this administration, nor even perhaps in our lifetime on this planet. But let us begin. In your hands, my fellow citizens, more than mine, will rest the final success or failure of our course. Since this country was founded, each generation of Americans has been summoned to give testimony to its national loyalty. The graves of young Americans who answered the call to service surround the globe. Now the trumpet summons us againnot as a call to bear arms, though arms we neednot as a call to battle, though embattled we arebut a call to bear the burden of a long twilight struggle, year in and year out, rejoicing in hope; patient in tribulation, a struggle against the common enemies of man: tyranny, poverty, disease, and war itself. Can we forge against these enemies a grand and global alliance, North and South, East and West, that can assure a more fruitful life for all mankind? Will you join in that historic effort? In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger. I do not shrink from this responsibilityI welcome it. I do not believe that any of us would exchange places with any other people or any other generation. The energy, the faith, the devotion which we bring to this endeavor will light our country and all who serve it. And the glow from that fire can truly light the world. And so, my fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for youask what you can do for your country. My fellow citizens of the world, ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man. Finally, whether you are citizens of America or citizens of the world, ask of us here the same high standards of strength and sacrifice which we ask of you. With a good conscience our only sure reward, with history the final judge of our deeds, let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking his blessing and his help, but knowing that here on earth Gods work must truly be our own. NEXT: Ted Sorensen on the Kennedy Style of Speech-Writing

Comparing And Contrasting Two Selected Learning Environment Venues Essay

Comparing And Contrasting Two Selected Learning Environment Venues - Essay Example Furthermore, by comparing the campus to a joint "information space" where we are gratis to roam and "interoperate" at will, we underline the role that proprietary limits have played in making online learning a outlying, cramped, and sensitively "flat" skill (A. Kay and A. Goldberg,2002, 31-41). The famous instructive developers regard this supple platform as the base for a next-generation online learning environment, one that is really further multi-dimensional than the management system paradigm. Any approach to online education that carry on restrict itself to the discharge of content alone ignores all the penetration and surface of campus life, the length of by the social and joint nature of learning. Of the three broad aspire of higher education- 3) Growth of an intentional, or independent, approach to life-long learning present online learning environments are moderately successful in organization only the first, most transactional of goals. In this respect, they have failed to give a "port of entry" into theoretical consideration for students who learn most excellent by doing and during straight interactions with their peers (C. Dede, 2004). The mainstream of these "virtual universities" futile as commercial ventures mainly since they accessible their register of online courses as a feasible alternative rather than a addition to conservative campus instruction. Considerably, these "virtual campuses" transfer to the online empire only those real-world campus practices that necessary the least technical complexity to duplicate e.g. course management and lecture-style, one-to-many lessons techniques. By contrast, the Education environmental factors are worried with raising a next-generation technical environment that encourages educational novelty rather than easy duplication of managerial practices and release of pre-packaged satisfied. Among other reason, such environment platform would proffer educational researchers with an open-source "collaboratory" in which to build, split, apply and assess transformative instruction practices, counting research in simulation-based learning, all inside a unrelenting and immersive so cial circumstance (C. Levi-Strauss. 2005). College Study Environment What is it concerning the college campus that makes it dissimilar from further spaces One meaning of a campus is the open space among and approximately the buildings, but as the experts suggest, the word has forever alluded to the type of human interactions that take place there. These connections, taken jointly, make up what is recognized as "campus life." Housing, protect, and preserve the finest that is recognized and deliberation in the world, the campus buildings and grounds provide a sense of pushiness and permanence to a student's knowledge over time (Covey, S. R. 1989). How much of a position does campus life play in effectual

Other Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Other - Assignment Example Macro decisions may be applied to save his or her life as the law allows. The macro decisions also reflect on the government decision on health related measures despite being controversial in majority of the counties. Secondly, law regulates is a regulatory strategy that is used in most instances like in statutory language which is used in authorizing payments for hospitals. In addition, they determine the kind of systems that are incorporated within the health care system, and which are beneficial to consumer health care. An example the system includes the Medicare regulated reimbursement that a health consumer is entitled to receive. Thirdly, the administrative procedure act which acts to clarify and direct different implementations with the health care centers and towards consumer health. The act is responsible for the numerous implementations like the Medicare and Medicaid that adds value to consumer health. In addition, the act ensures that laws for those who implement and those who are governed by the measures are effective and adhered to (Institute of Medicine (U.S.)., 2003). 2. Determine if there have been mergers or closing of hospitals in your area in the last several years (anywhere in the U.S) explain those closing/mergers in the context of the materials. In my area, hospitals are merging with the intent of increasing their productivity towards consumer health. This has caused us heavily because of the increased cost of Medicare services offered by this merged hospitals. However, it is noted that the merged hospitals provide quality care and increased savings as patients are correctly diagnosed and treated before their conditions worsens. Most hospitals in my area that have merged have done due to fear of not surviving independently. They believe that by merging, resources are pooled together thus quality of services offered at the merged center is improved. Thus, merging expands and increases the utilization of hospitals in my area by increasing th e diversity of the services offered. Most hospitals that are merging in my area are taken over by larger hospitals who posses the potential to improve the equipments and services offered by purchasing new products and employing more and qualified staff to serve patients suffering from different ailments (Kaplan, 2000). 3. Select a health care market and describe how it deviates from the perfectly competitive model and recommend policies that could repair the deviation(s) from completion you identified. The free health care market deviates from the perfectly competitive model due to the numerous government interventions. When the government interferes with the free health market then resources are not accurately allocated due to biasness. Some of its rules and regulations are also not conducive for perfectly competitive model because health resources are allocated optimally. The government in most cases deems a free health care market not to be suitable to an ideal health care system as it is not sufficient enough to allocate the health care resources adequately. To stop the government from interfering in the free health care market, I will recommend the free markets to form a law that determines the level to which they can allow the government to interfere in their activities. This is because the government does not create free markets, but they have the

A Real Divide Between the Law and Ethics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

A Real Divide Between the Law and Ethics - Essay Example Virtue ethics does not really provide clear cut criteria for the rightness or wrongness of an act but, it can tell you whether the person is good or bad depending on behavioural manifestations. Moreover, virtue ethics does not address the problem of relativism – one good trait may not be considered as good in another culture. Another theory is utilitarianism. In this theory, the rightness or wrongness of the act is dependent on the entailed consequences of the act (Velasquez, 2006). If there will be many beneficiaries from the act, then the act is good. In other words, if the act will make more people happy, then the act is good. In this sense, as the focus is turned on the consequence of the act, counting how many will be happier or how many will benefit from the act becomes the parameter for the rightness or wrongness of the act. This theory is criticised because it is vague as to what is happiness and how happy will be measured. Moreover, the question of relativism and the danger of the fallacy of the majority become an inherent concern of this theory. Duty-based ethics is the last theory that will be briefly discussed. According to this theory, rightness or wrongness of the act does not depend on its consequence, rather, rightness or wrongness is inherent in the act itself. As such, there are acts that one ought to do and acts which one ought not to do. This theory provides a straightforward directive on what ought to be done. This is because the theory rests on the assumption that all human beings are a rational human agent and as rational agents, they will do the right act and avoid the wrong one.

The Main Features Of An Oligopoly

The Main Features Of An Oligopoly This part of the coursework aims to identify and explain the main economic features of an Oligopoly and also the key economic theories which influence the price of a product or service. This part deals with the theoretical aspects of Oligopoly and the later part emphasizes on the practical applications of the theories and oligopoly features. According to Pass et al (2000), Oligopoly, a type of market structure is characterised by a few firms and many buyers, where the bulk of market supply is in the control of relatively few large firms who in turn sell to many small buyers. To describe the degree of oligopoly, concentration ratio is often utilized. Concentration ratio is the measure of the market share of the largest four firms in the industry expressed as a percentage. A low concentration ratio suggests a high level of competition and vice versa for. As there are few players dominating the industry, each player or an oligopolist is said or likely to be aware of others course of actions. The decision taken by one player seems to affect the decision taken by others and strategic planning by the firms needs to take into account the likely response of other participants (Wikipedia, 2010). For example, a proper game of chess depends on how well you read your opponents moves, similarly in oligopoly; strategies are devised ba sed on the moves of competing market firms. The reason for existence oligopoly as stated by Maunder et al (1991) is for the achievement of economies of scale. Firms tend to reduce their average cost of production by increasing their scale of operation and since the small firms have higher average costs, they tend to go out of business or be absorbed by the larger ones. The features of oligopoly are:- Number of Firms:-The very important feature of an oligopoly is the number of firms. Even though there are a large number of firms operating in a particular industry, only a handful of firms hold the major share between them. Interdependence: A very distinctive feature of an oligopoly is interdependence. When a very few large firms operate in a particular industry, their activities or strategy cannot be independent of each other. Unlike monopoly, where the monopolist need not worry about the reaction of its rivals as there are none, an oligopolist takes into consideration the possible reactions of all rival firms. For example, a company considering a price reduction of its products may wish to estimate the chances of price reduction by the rival company and hence starting a price war. Profit Maximization Condition: The firms in an oligopoly generally agree to co-operate and act as one monopolist as it generates high profits (Begg and Ward 2007). This kind of formal collusive agreement is called a cartel. An oligopoly maximises profits where the marginal revenue equals the marginal cost. This is also known as profit maximization condition. Price ELASTIC UNIT ELASTIC P MC, AC PROFIT MAXIMIZING OUTPUT O MR Quantity (Source: Begg and Ward 2007) Perfect Knowledge: Oligopolists are said to have a perfect knowledge about their cost and demand functions but a lesser information about other firms (Wikipedia, 2010). Entry Barrier: One of the main important features of oligopoly also is the entry barrier. There are high entry barriers that restrain a new firm from entering a market. For example, the barriers can be the economies of scale, access to expensive and complex technology, lower costs for an established firm, brand loyalty, patented production process and strategic action by incumbent firms etc. The table below gives the market concentration in different industries. tb_0901 tb_0903 As discussed earlier, the large few firms form a cartel and set a price. Once the members of the cartel agree on the price, they compete against each other using non price competition in order to gain the maximum revenue. There are other various ways in which the firms fix the price. One of them being tacit collusion, where the firms agree on a price set by an established leader. This is also known as dominant firm price leadership as the price setting firm is the dominant firm in the industry. The other way is the barometric firm price leadership, where the price leader is the one whose prices reflect the market conditions in the most stable form (Sloman et al, 2010). To fix prices, the producers must be able to control the market supply. The other forms of price fixing in tacit collusion is average cost pricing, where producers add a certain percentage of profit on top of average costs and price benchmarking, where firms raise the price only up to a benchmark already set. Price fixing is achieved by the competing firms coming together on a platform where they can agree on a common pricing and production strategy thus acting in a manner in which a monopoly operates. This kind of collusion is known as cartelisation. Cartels although banned in many countries, is difficult for the enforcement agencies to gather evidence and penalise the participants. The quantity for the cartel and the individual firm will not be the same as one firm individually will have the scope for further increase in productivity to achieve a situation where the marginal cost equals the marginal revenue. In such cases firms may decide to go ahead with excess supply which can le ad to a price war and inconsistent revenues to the industry. Even without overt collusion firms in an oligopoly are able to reach a point of profit maximisation when they behave in a manner reflected in Nash Equilibrium (Begg and Ward 2007). 2B) Direct to Home (DTH) television industry in India acting as an oligopoly. India has a total television population of about 135 million of which about 108 million have an access to cable and satellite television (Plugged in, 2010). The total DTH sub base at the end of first quarter in the year 2010 was 23 million (Dish TV India Ltd, 2010) which was about just 1 million in the year 2006. Indian DTH industry has seen a flurry of activities in the recent years after a monopolistic reign by Dish TV for a couple of years. It is currently in a state of Oligopoly with the top four operators controlling nearly 80% of the total market. The major players in the market are Dish TV by Zee group, TataSky- a joint venture by Tata and Star TV, Big TV by Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group, Digital TV by Bharati Telemedia and SUN Direct from Sun TV. Since there are only 3 major players in the DTH market, Indian DTH industry is an oligopoly. (Indiadth, 2010) The product offering by the rival firms are more or less similar in nature with little or no product differentiation. Amongst all the players, Sun Direct has essentially remained a regional operator who made a late debut in the national scene. The content or the channels are same with all the operators barring few omissions and additions. The DTH industry market share is as follows. BRAND MARKET SHARE Dish TV 30% TataSky 22% Sun Direct 25% Big Tv 13% Airtel 8% D2H 2% (Source: http://www.pluggd.in/dth-industry-in-india-analysis-297/) From the data above we can see that Dish TV, TataSky and Sun Direct together hold the maximum market share with over 75%. (Source: http://www.slideshare.net/) To confirm the oligopoly, we can use the Herfindahl-Hirschman index or the HHI. It measures the size of the firms in relation to the industry and also indicates the amount of competition between them. Mathematically, download (1) (Adapted from Pass et al, 2000) Here Si = market share of firm i in the market and N is the number of firms. Hence H = 302 + 222 + 252 + 132 + 82 + 22 H = 2246. With this value of H we can conclude that this industry is an oligopoly. Although there is no indication of an overt collusion in the industry, a closer look at their price plan (fig 1.1) can lead us to a strategic or tacit understanding between the players. The market is abuzz with marketing drives to garner market share and the customer is currently loaded with freebies like free installation, free channels and the like. Going by the level of investment and infrastructure the operators need to garner as much subscriber base as possible to be in a profitable proposition. They are however aware of the competition and are refraining from a price war. Such behaviour of the operators is characteristic of a non-price competition in Oligopoly. This is due to the interdependency of firms in the oligopoly and the strategic behaviour can also be referred to the Nash Equilibrium (Begg and Ward 2007). (Source: Slideshare.net/researchonIndia) Brand Name PricePlan(inINR)/month Dish TV 135.00 TataSky 150.00 Sun Direct 115.00 Videocon 136.00 Fig: 1.1 (Source: Company websites, 2010) Now as in any oligopoly, it has to be supported by entry barriers, both endogenous and exogenous. The natural barrier of entry in this particular industry is primarily associated with government licensing and also the intensity of capital investment required. Given that all the DTH operators are already established players in related sectors such as telecom, media it gives them a strategic advantage in terms of distribution and content. For any new entrant it could pose as a strategic entry barrier. Indian DTH market has constantly been attracting different players over the years given the increasing number of television subscribers. Although there have been entry barriers, companies like Videocon along with its cutting edge technology entered into the market in the presence of established players. The cutting edge technology proved to be a barrier breaker. Videocon managed to build television sets with set top boxes which helped it develop its own customer base.

Questions Frequently Asked Concerning the Purchase of a Website :: Sell Websites Buy Websites

Questions Frequently Asked Concerning the Purchase of a Website Reprinted with permission of VotanWeb.com What are the key motivators for people to buy a website? Before making a decision to purchase a website, a buyer should understand his or her objectives to make sure those objectives can be met by purchasing a particular website. Surveys of people purchasing websites reveal similar responses. Surprisingly, making money is not at the top of the list. Here is a list of the typical answers, in their order of importance: I want to control my own destiny. I would be happier if I worked for myself. My current work does not take advantage of my skills and abilities. I want to make a lot of money. Should I start my own website or buy an existing website? An existing website has a historical track record (good or bad) which can be used to evaluate the website. An existing website has usually shown there is demand for its products or services, and it should have, among other things, detailed financial records. Sometimes, a seller of a website will agree to help to train a new owner. These are important factors because many websites tend to fail during the early stage of their development. On the other hand, there can also be disadvantages to buying an existing website. A buyer will be assuming an established website culture and infrastructure which may make implementing changes more difficult. Also buyers will generally have to pay a premium for an existing website. What should I be looking for in a website? A buyer should only consider a website he or she will feel comfortable owning and operating. The time and effort which will be required is an important consideration as is how much the buyer can afford to pay for the website. The amount of cash the buyer needs to regularly take out of the website is very important, especially if the website is to be the buyer's only source of income. Because many experts believe you should not purchase a website unless you can make it better, it is helpful if a buyer has some definite ideas on how to improve the purchased website. Can I obtain financing to help me buy a website? The availability of outside financing will depend upon the asset base of the website, its operating history, collateral availability and projected cash flow - the same issues considered in all business lending.